وِکیٖپیٖڈیا پؠٹھٕ، اَکھ آزاد اِنسایکلوپیٖڈیا
0
Quick fail
0a
It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
0b
It contains copyright violations
0c
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include {{cleanup }}, {{POV }}, {{unreferenced }} or large numbers of {{citation needed }}, {{clarify }}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF }})
0d
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page
0e
A reviewer who has not previously reviewed the article determines that any issues from previous GA nominations have not been adequately considered
1
Well-written
1a
the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience ; spelling and grammar are correct
1b
it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections , layout , words to watch , fiction , and list incorporation
2
Verifiable no original research
2a
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
2b
all inline citations are from reliable sources , including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counterintuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged , and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
2c
it contains no original research
2d
it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism
3
Broad in its coverage
3a
it addresses the main aspects of the topic
3b
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style )
4
Neutral
5
Stable : it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
6
Illustrated , if possible, by media such as images , video , or audio
6a
media are tagged with their copyright statuses , and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
6b
media are to the topic, and have suitable captions
